By Susan Grant, CFA Director of Consumer Protection and Privacy 1/4/16 A rule recently proposed
by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) made me scratch my head and wonder, “what
are those folks at the IRS thinking?” If adopted, the rule would require
nonprofit organizations to ask people who donate $250 or more for their Social
Security numbers (SSNs). The idea is to make it easier for donors to
substantiate such contributions. But on balance, it’s a really bad idea. Currently, a taxpayer who wants to claim a charitable deduction
for a donation of $250 or more must ask the organization that receives it for
something called a “contemporaneous written acknowledgement” (CWA) and submit
that documentation to the IRS with his or her tax return. It’s not difficult to
request a CWA or for an organizations to provide it, and in the background for
the proposed rule the IRS notes that the “present CWA system works effectively,
with minimal burden on donors and donees.” Some taxpayers whose charitable deductions
have been questioned, however, have argued that it would be easier if the
organizations to which they donated reported that information directly to the
IRS. To do so, the organizations would need the donors’ SSNs. Maybe this would make the process of claiming such
deductions easier, but the drawbacks for both donors and charitable
organizations would far outweigh the benefits. In CFA’s comments
to the IRS, we explained that since many nonprofits aren’t equipped to
adequately safeguard this type of sensitive information, donors’ SSNs could be
exposed to theft and abuse from inside or outside of the organizations. And donors
would understandably be wary of providing their SSNs because of concerns about
identity theft. That could have a negative impact on organizations’ ability to
raise money. Ironically, even the identity theft tips on the
IRS website warn against providing your SSN to anyone unless it’s absolutely
necessary. That’s standard advice that we’ve all been trying to drill into
people’s minds for years. The proposed rule would detract from that simple
message and make it easier for crooks, posing as legitimate charities, to obtain
would-be donors’ SSNs.
Given the fact that government benefits fraud was by far the
most prevalent use of consumers’ stolen personal information in identity theft
complaints reported to the Federal Trade Commission last year,
it’s clear that there should be less
unnecessary collection and use of SSNs, not more.
We want health care providers and others who routinely ask for SSNs to stop; we
don’t want nonprofit organizations to start asking for them. The IRS should
focus on real problems,
like how to deter tax ID fraud and provide better help for victims. |